From: Andi K. <ak...@su...> - 2001-01-22 21:58:24
|
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 02:23:05PM -0500, Bill Hartner wrote: > Mike K, wrote : > > > > > If the above is accurate, then I am wondering what would be a > > good scheduler benchmark for these low task count situations. > > I could undo the optimizations in sys_sched_yield() (for testing > > purposes only!), and run the existing benchmarks. Can anyone > > suggest a better solution? > > Hacking sys_sched_yield is one way around it. How about process pairs that bounce around tokens in pipes ? -Andi |