From: <jt...@us...> - 2006-06-23 21:17:47
|
>>>>> "MattH" == <mat...@us...> writes: MattH> This allows per-task watchers to implement inheritance of the MattH> same function and/or data in response to the initialization of MattH> new tasks. A watcher might implement inheritance using the MattH> following notifier_call snippet: I think this would meet our needs--we (MVFS) need to initialize some new state in a child process based on our state in the parent process (essentially, module-private inherited per-process state). It may still be a bit clumsy to find the per-process state in other situations, though. While a process is executing our module's code, would it be safe to traverse current's notifier chain to find our state? -- John Kohl Senior Software Engineer - Rational Software - IBM Software Group Lexington, Massachusetts, USA jt...@us... <http://www.ibm.com/software/rational/> |