From: Paul E. M. <pa...@us...> - 2006-03-13 18:20:15
|
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 04:17:19PM +0100, Simon Derr wrote: > > Hi, > > I was reading the minutes of a 'Linux-on-NUMA' meeting of March 2001 (I > feel a bit like an archaeologist) and this catched my eye: > > "Subsequent discussion divided NUMA functionality into three groups: > > (1) changes to improve performance on NUMA for non-NUMA-aware applications, > (2) changes to provide simple control of resources and execution as would > be needed for benchmarks and the like, and > (3) changes to allow more general and declarative control of resources and execution. > > It would be very nice if the APIs for #2 were a nice subset of those for #3." > > (http://lse.sourceforge.net/numa/older_stuff/meetings/mtg.2001.03.26/minutes.html) > > > I think we can say that many kernel-level improvements that have been > added since then cover group #1. > > sys_schedsetaffinity(), libnuma and cpusets cover group #2. > > And what about group #3 ? > > Is anyone aware of ongoing work in that direction ? Some would argue that cpusets covers some of the functionality in #3. One important step would be to check up on what the performance and usability benefits of #3 would be. Today's NUMA machines are much "flatter" than were a number of the mid-90s machines, so the mileage one could expect to get from advanced NUMA-support functionality may well have changed. Thanx, Paul |