From: Andrew M. <ak...@os...> - 2005-03-02 09:08:24
|
Guillaume Thouvenin <gui...@bu...> wrote: > > So I ran the lmbench with three different kernels with the fork > connector patch I just sent. Results are attached at the end of the mail > and there are three different lines which are: > > o First line is a linux-2.6.11-rc4-mm1-cnfork > o Second line is a linux-2.6.11-rc4-mm1 > o Third line is a linux-2.6.11-rc4-mm1-cnfork with a user space > application. The user space application listened during 15h > and received 6496 messages. > > Each test has been ran only once. > > ... > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Host OS Mhz null null open slct sig sig fork exec sh > call I/O stat clos TCP inst hndl proc proc proc > --------- ------------- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- > account Linux 2.6.11- 2765 0.17 0.26 3.57 4.19 16.9 0.51 2.31 162. 629. 2415 > account Linux 2.6.11- 2765 0.16 0.26 3.56 4.17 17.6 0.50 2.30 163. 628. 2417 > account Linux 2.6.11- 2765 0.16 0.27 3.67 4.25 17.6 0.51 2.28 176. 664. 2456 This is the interesting bit, yes? 5-10% slowdown on fork is expected, but why was exec slower? What does "The user space application listened during 15h" mean? |