From: Martin J. B. <mb...@ar...> - 2003-03-01 20:44:05
|
>> Sorry ... must be sleepy still ... above was for kernbench. Below is >> for SDET 64 (the dcache stuff does seem significantly more expensive). >> >> 1508 3.4% total >> 750 2.3% default_idle >> 221 10.8% __down >> 117 18.5% __wake_up >> 115 44.4% d_lookup > > No + or - entry for d_lookup. This means it didn't change at all ? No ... + is implicit, ie it was 115 more ticks (at 100Hz) ... 44% more ticks with your patch than without. M. |