From: Guy <say...@ti...> - 2007-12-14 08:50:58
|
Tim wrote: >>>>Maybe what the poster was implying was that people assume that a >>>>a project's 1.x version is going to be the better one to get than a 0.9 >>>>version, which is somehow inferior >>>> >> >>The fact that there are two active branches (0.9 and 1.0) tends to >> confuse the situation too. >> >> Hi Again I agree. A 1.0 release is often seen as synonymous with stable. Look, for example, at the wine projects working towards a 1.0 release (the fact many of us have been using wine for years underlines the confusion) G |