From: David M. <es...@ti...> - 2005-05-18 14:41:12
|
> > - I was regularly annoyed by the fact that if I was using ardour to do my > > audio recording and mixing, that I had to setup separate outputs and > > routes for each soft synth in muse and set levels for each one as well. > > I see the wave functionality of muse as a convienience for simple types > > of recording, but don't see it trying to compete with ardour in the long > > term nor do I think muse should. Curious what others think. "All in one" > > vs the "jack enabled system" > > For me having all the "house keeping" things in one app is the only way, > I'm too disorganized to be capable of anything else ;) > So, MusE will definitely gain more functionality in this area, it might be > a while though. You are of course welcome to help! We've been talking about > atleast being able to launch an external sound editor in the short run. > > Do note that the above is my personal opinion. I have nothing against that > other, more capable, users create usage environments on a bigger scale and > we will do our best to support this scenario as well. > > -- > Input about what the primary concerns with the current audio support is > appreciated. Trimming of soundfiles perhaps? > > Regards, > Robert > > > - There is no single gui that can appropriately accomodate even a small > > subset of synths, so being good at working with external synths is still > > a really good idea. |