From: Geoff B. <ge...@la...> - 2013-05-15 12:27:08
|
On 05/15/2013 08:29 PM, Florian Jung wrote: > ok so we all agree that we want to move to one of {github, bitbucket} > and {git,mercurial}. > > just, which of the three combinations (git,github), (git, bitbucket) and > (mercurial, bitbucket) do we want? > > github is free-of-charge for open-source projects. bitbucket is even > more free-of-charge, because it also allows "small" closed-source projects. > > but as this is not a problem for us, and because bitbucket seems to be a > not-so-good plagiate of github, i'd vote against (git, bitbucket). > > > So do we want to use git (and github) or mercurial (and bitbucket) then? > > i have used both systems a bit, but not much (only locally, committing > and a tiny bit of branching), and have seen no real difference. > > vote! > > greetings, > flo > as a simple dumb-arsed user I find github no problem at all, so it gets my vote as a repo at least. easy to use from my pov and works fine. best g |