From: Robert J. <spa...@gm...> - 2012-03-25 20:44:34
|
Hi Tim, Den 25 mars 2012 20:24 skrev Tim E. Real <ter...@ro...>: > On March 25, 2012 12:49:41 PM Florian Jung wrote: >> Am 22.03.2012 18:23, schrieb Tim E. Real: >> > On March 22, 2012 3:15:26 PM Florian Jung wrote: >> >> you definitely want my "layered" tracks feature then. it would allow >> >> you >> >> to record clean waves (or use the "clean" output of any software >> >> synth), >> >> and pipe it through various effects. if you don't change the effects, >> >> muse automatically uses a recorded version of the clean wave piped >> >> through all your effects, not wasting cpu cycles. but if you change >> >> some >> >> plugin there, muse transparently re-applies the effect, giving you the >> >> up-to-date output. think of it as cache ;) >> >> await it in muse 2.1 or 2.2 ;) >> > >> > Sounds neat. Good to save cycles. >> > Sort of similar to our bounce feature. >> >> or even a replacement for bounce. i can't think of any situation where >> one would want to bounce if muse can do it internally anyway; and even >> if we want to keep "bouncing", we could drastically simplify it, by just >> taking the "prerecorded"/cached wave. > > Bounce is intended to take exactly 'what you hear' at the output > and dump it down to a final file or track with conversions if necessary. > It is a very handy one-step to create a final 16-bit CD-ready track. Yes and that is definitely a good function. There is however the bounce-to-track feature which I believe is the one Florian means, with his intended freeze functionality bounce-to-track would not be needed and quite improved. > I don't know if we can so easily do that internally in a way that is different > from how we do it now. > > Did you know that bounce can make use of Jack's freewheel mode > to dramatically speed up the operation? I've been meaning to get back to this, as some might recall I made a bug about freewheeling which someone else (florian?) could not reproduce. I think there needs to be a plugin involved, maybe a vst, as that was what I had when I got it to misbehave. Then the output gets all scrambled. We should fix it but since there is a workaround I think it's post 2.0 Regards, Robert |