From: Florian J. <flo...@we...> - 2012-03-03 12:43:10
|
Am 03.03.2012 13:02, schrieb Robert Jonsson: > Hi guys, > > 2012/3/1 Florian Jung<flo...@we...>: > >> Hi >> >> muse has orphaned sourcefiles, that is: source files which are included >> nowhere and which contain only dead code. >> >> muse/sig.cpp and muse/sig.h are such files, for example (there are much >> more, mainly files replaced by AWL or AL counterparts) >> >> what should we do with them? i'd propose to remove them, because it's >> confusing if you edit some file and see no effect until you notice that >> you need the AL file, not the "normal one" >> >> in case the "old" files still contain any usable code the new files do >> not contain, we should port it, right? >> >> >> as i go through the code, i'll mark them so that a >> >> find . -iname '*.cpp' -or -iname '*.h' | xargs grep ORPHAN >> >> will find them. >> > Ok good. As I tried to say in the other mail. I'm more leaning against > removing stuff we don't actually use. > (that's what i'd call "rotten" code, as opposed to "a bit old but working" branches which might exist in attic/ (?)) > Regards, > Robert > > |