From: Mr. K. <kp...@st...> - 2009-10-26 07:54:20
|
Quoting Geoff Beasley <ge...@la...>: > On Sunday 25 October 2009 23:45:47 Martin Drautzburg wrote: > > On Saturday, 24. October 2009 20:44:47 Mr. KP wrote: > > > > I would like to understand what you are talking about. What's wrong with > > simply creating an audio CD with "k3b"? Sorry for my ignorance. > > > very simply, a way of moving CD track flags on a timeline within a burning > session with visual waveforms. > > g. > Martin- yea, its the fact that its visual. Its not that it is wrong to use k3b or anything else that will allow you to do track by track burning. DAWs like Ardour, Traverso, and my ol' Roload 1680 are designed for audio manipulation so the concept of burning a CD right from them became common place. Programs like Muse have their roots in midi tracking but of course, it also does handle audio. You could say that Muse with enough plugins could be called a DAW- I go back to the fact that you could use Jamin to do mastering and run the outputs to Ardour or even back to Muse so at this point having Muse be able to generate the CD track flags and create image for burning would be a plus. The Roland 1680 can do either method but to tell the truth if you really want the easiest time producing a CD, you'll want to have the full mix in the DAW so you can move things around. Doing things like adding intermissions or crossfades is trivial when you can simply move/add/delete the CD track pointers. Actually, being able to record to mp3 directly would probably be nice too even though anyone doing music I'm sure has tons of tools to do wave <--> mp3 conversions. :) --- --- | | | Studio K Productions LLC Keith C. Perry, Exec. Producer | | http://studiokproductions.com kp...@st... | | +1.215.525.4165 x2033 | | | --- --- ______________________________________ This email account is being hosted by: VCSN, Inc : http://vcsn.com |