From: <son...@ii...> - 2009-02-11 23:42:40
|
On Wed Feb 11 11:02 , "son...@ii..." sent: > > >On Wed Feb 11 10:55 , Tim sent: > >>On February 7, 2009 09:06:06 am allan k wrote: >>> HI >>> >>> Thanks for this version. >>> >>> Unfortunately it seems that MIDI sync is broken both slave and master >>> modes.... >>> >>> Is there any way I can help debug this? >>> >>OK, I tested midi sync in and out with my 1986 Ensoniq ESQ1 keyboard. >>When the keyboard is master and muse is slave, things seem to be >> working OK, except for a few issues with positioning the muse cursor etc. >> >>When muse is master and the keyboard is slave, things aren't so good: >>If I hit play in muse, the keyboard runs through its song much too fast. >>By the time muse reaches bar 2, for example, the keyboard is at bar 12, >> and I hear the keyboard 'race' through its song way too fast. >>And if I manually position the muse cursor past bar 7, the keyboard >> responds with an error and resets itself. >> >>So I'm looking at the muse sync coding... Complicated stuff! >>I have to admit I don't know a lot about midi syncing. >>I did not change anything related to midi sync in all my fixes. >> >>What is your experience with the sync issue? >>Thanks. Tim. >>) > >I had some much more serious issues than you. > >MusE would start in slave mode but the bar and beat position seemed all wrong. My >external sequencer only works at 96ppq I had changed the resolution down to that >in MusE but it didn't seem to have an effect. > >When pressing stop, I would lose the cursor altogether and I couldn't restart >again without restarting MusE altogether. > >In Master Mode, the external sequencer would get the start and stop messages, but >again the timing between the 2 systems didn't seem to correllate. > >A couple of things about my system. It is 64 bit and uses GCC 4.3. I am building >another one in 32 bit (Gentoo) over the next couple of days.. again this is with >GCC 4.3 for core2 optimisations (which seemed to make a big difference on 64 >bit).. However if this is going to cause compatibility issues let me know and >I'll rollback the system to gcc 4.1 and generic i686 optimisation. > >I also conducted these tests using the emagic AMT-8 and Unitor 8 racks I have. I >am going to try another re-test with the MIDI ports on the Delta 1010 (unload >snd-usb-audio and patch a cord from the front bay on one of the emagics to the >Delta) this is just to see if latency over USB is causing further issues >considering your results were a bit better than mine. > >Are there any debug settings (at compile time or otherwise) that I can enable to >help debug this issue?? > >cheers > >Allan > Postponing the 32 bit install till the weekend and will most likely be Arch linux (I donwloaded the iso last night Geoff!!) . However I did unplug the usb cable from the emagic units and try patching a cable to the input of the delta 1010... No good same results.. |