From: Michael T. <Mic...@lu...> - 2009-11-24 20:51:12
|
On Nov 24, 2009, at 5:48 PM, Cristian Constantin wrote: > hi! > > suppose that the link on which an sctp association was setup is getting > congested. the local send buffers are getting full with data > to be sent to the remote peer. also: in the protocol running over > sctp there are packets (management packets) having a higher priority > than the other ones (data packets). > > now, in this conditions of congestion you want that a management packet is > sent _before_ all the data that is filling up the send buffer. > > a. it seems that multiple streams does NOT help here since > the cwnd is per association. > > b. what about sending it unordered? is it going to be put in front of > all the other ones in the buffer and be sent as soon as this is > possible? > What helps are having priorities assigned to streams and scheduling of the streams. Robin is working on it and there is a prototype implementation. But it is for FreeBSD, not for LKSCTP... Contact Robin and me if you want further information. Best regards Michael > thanks! > bye now! > cristian > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > Lksctp-developers mailing list > Lks...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lksctp-developers > |