From: Michael H. <HO...@de...> - 2007-04-20 12:19:26
|
Rajesham Gajjela <raj...@ya...> wrote on 04/20/2007 10:42:48 AM: > > Two advantages definitely are: > > > > * lcrash can be built cross arch > > When I last tested (about a year back), many of its > commands does not work on x86_64 arch. Works fine for s390/s390x. > > * lcrash has a built-in scripting language (sial) > > I am not sure about the advantage of sial. But, I am > guessing that you can write your own macros with > sial(?). If this is the case, then gdb has also > facility to write macros. sial is a C-like scripting language, which has the big advantage, that you can often just copy kernel code into a sial script. You can implement your own lcrash commands in sial. It is by far better to use for dumpanalyis then using gdb macros. At least I have not seen any gdb macros used for dumpanalysis. Do you have? Michael |