From: <col...@hi...> - 2002-10-19 20:59:31
|
Hi! Blars Blarson "bl...@bl..." wrote: [...] >> If the answer to the above is no, then is it possible to use a second >> serial port for the second receiver? > > This is not trivial with the current driver code. This realy should > be rewritten to allow multiple lirc_serial ports on one system. Do we really need this? We are currently thinking (Manuel actually has already started) about a clean-up of the LIRC kernel interface and one major design decision will be if we really need a major number or if a misc-minor will be sufficient for the kernel drivers. In the latter case you will always be restricted to at most one infrared receiver per system. Currently I'm not really conviced that for such kind of interface that the infrared remote control is, you will really need several receivers. Can anybody give good examples that will justify the need for several receivers per system. Christoph |