Re: Retiring smode2

[Bengt M. <bu...@be...>]

On 09/03/14 10:24, Alec Leamas wrote:
> In the work with the upcoming 0.9.2 release the question about retiring
> smode is on the table. To me, this looks like an application with many
> dependencies, little usage and overlapping functionality with  mode2/xmode2.

Go ahead. IMHO, it is much more sane to make sure that programs of that 
kind can export data to other programs more suited to plotting, 
analysing, converting,... than implementing very primitive and 
anachronistic graphic capabilities.


BTW, similar statements hold for more than smode2...

Greets,

Bengt