From: Maxim L. <max...@gm...> - 2009-09-20 21:34:16
|
On Sun, 2009-09-20 at 13:04 +0200, Christoph Bartelmus wrote: > Hi! > > Maxim Levitsky "max...@gm..." wrote: > [...] > >> I'm always a bit reluctant to change things that simply work. > >> Maybe you can add some reasoning what would be the advantage of the > >> change. > > > I want to get rid of fops usage in lirc drivers. > > I'd like to do it in small steps. > First one would be to change all drivers still implementing their own > open() function and get rid of that. > Then rename set_use_inc/set_use_dec. Still looking for a good name. > Add a field for LIRC_GET_REC_RESOLUTION into the lirc_driver struct. > > Is this something you'd like to work on? Exactly! Best regards, Maxim Levitsky |