From: Bengt M. <bu...@be...> - 2009-08-03 19:20:20
|
Hi, Christoph Bartelmus wrote: > Hi! > > Bengt Martensson "bu...@be..." wrote: > [...] >> I would like to change syntax and semantics of the SEND_STOP directive >> as follows: > [...] >> Proposal: Change to >> >> SEND_STOP >> >> without arguments. > > Any change to the protocol must be backwards compatible. > I don't mind dropping the arguments to SEND_STOP, but lircd must still > accept them when given. It does accept all the old arguments, it just does not evaluate (or require) them. Bengt |