Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] [BK FBDEV] A few more updates.

[Antonino D. <ad...@po...>]

On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 18:42, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> On 26 Mar 03 at 17:53, Antonino Daplas wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 13:34, James Simmons wrote:
> > > 
> > > > 5.  softcursor should not concern itself with memory bookkeeping, and
> > > > must be able to function with just the parameter passed to it in order
> > > > to keep it as simple as possible.  These tasks are moved to
> > > > accel_cursor.
> > > 
> > > We do if we make a ioctl for cursors. I'm trying to avoid reprogramming 
> > > the hardware over and over again if the properties of the cursor don't 
> > > change. The idea is similar to passing in var and comparing it to the var 
> > > in struct fb_info. 
> > 
> > Of course, that's what the fb_cursor.set field is for, and drivers have
> > the option of ignoring or not ignoring bits in this field. Whoever calls
> > fb_cursor has the responsibility of setting any cursor state changes. 
> > 
> > Unlike fb_set_var(), cursor states change very frequently (ie, each
> > blink or movement of the cursor are considered state changes), so just
> > forego the memcmp() and call fb_cursor unconditionally.  Let the
> > low-level method sort it out by checking bits in fb_cursor.set.
> 
> accel_cursor unconditionally sets FB_CUR_SETPOS. Can you write it
> down to the TODO list to eliminate this? Cursor position lives 
> in different registers than cursor enable/disable on my hardware...
> 

The patch that I submitted to James does that already.

> And if we could rename FB_CUR_SETCUR to FB_CUR_SETVISIBILITY and
> leave cursor->enable setting on accel_cursor's caller, it would
> be even better.
> 
> And if we could change enable value to 0: disable; 1: enable;
> 2: disable due to blink (called from vbl), it would be even better,
> as then fbdev which does hardware blinking could just completely
> ignore changes which set only FB_CUR_SETVISIBILITY with enable == 2.


Okay.


Tony