Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] [PATCH 00/19] OMAP: DSS2 v5 intro

[Artem B. <ded...@gm...>]

On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 10:42 -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Tomi Valkeinen <tom...@no...> [091111 01:43]:
> > On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 09:45 +0100, Valkeinen Tomi (Nokia-D/Helsinki)
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 13:40 +0100, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > > > Tomi,
> > > > 
> > > > could you please kindly ask Stephen (CCed) to include the DSS2 tree into
> > > > linux-next, because you are going to merge it the next merge window, and
> > > > there does not seem to be any blocker for this.
> > > > 
> > > > Being in linux-next for a while is really important.
> > > 
> > > Stephen, would this be possible? DSS2 driver is rather big piece of
> > > code, even if it's quite isolated, so it would be nice to have it in
> > > linux-next.
> > > 
> > > What does it require from me? A git tree, obviously, but what should it
> > > be based on?
> > 
> > Ah, I just realized that DSS2 patches depend on patches from Tony's
> > tree. I guess I should base my tree on top of some Tony's tree that is
> > going to linux-next?
> 
> Or I can merge them into my for-next if that's OK with everybody. This
> merge cycle is a pain for omap as we've moved all the common headers from
> include/mach to include/plat.

I thought everything stable which you are going to merge next merge
window should be in the next branch by default. Especially these massive
re-names which potentially may break many things, right?

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)