From: James S. <jsi...@in...> - 2006-11-20 16:43:25
|
> On 11/17/06, James Simmons <jsi...@in...> wrote: > > > > Are those actually numbers? If they are the problem isn't byte reversal > > but bit shifting. > > > > 1010100 = 54 > > 0101010 = 2A > > It's not byte reversal, but _bits_ of each bytes have been inversed > (bit7->bit0, bit6->bit1, bit5->bit2, bit4->bit3, bit3->bit4, ...) > after calling slow_imageblit(). Is it something expected ? Yipes!! Bit reversal. I have never seen that before. Is only the logo messed up? Slow_imageblit can be called if there is no dword alignment for the font bitmaps. So the question is do most if not all our fonts look okay? > > I really don't understand why fbmem.c has its own routines to handle the > > logo for the color > map. I can set creating a fbcmap and calling > > fb_set_cmap instead. > > Unfortunately I cannot help you on this point... > > > That will be a separte patch. > > > > Thanks > |