From: James S. <jsi...@in...> - 2003-07-29 16:56:28
|
> > matroxfb tried to use a 'dead' for handling hot removal, but your code > > looks definitely saner > > My code wasn't really intended to deal with hot-removal, more with > "what happens if printk occurs during the Power Management suspend > sequence", but I tried to keep the notification mecanism simple > enough so it could be used for that as well. Also, indeed, the fbcon > changes should deal with hot-removal in some way (though you surely > also want to "deatch" from the fbdev's in this case). > > Among other things that could be used for is live monitor insertion/ > removal detection (some HW are able to do that), "pivot" monitor > kind of things, etc... typically via the mode_changed hook. I knew it was a matter of time before "client" management would happen. Is this a 2.6.X thing tho or shoudl we wait for the next developement cycle. I don't mind working on experimental stuff. |