Re: [Linux-diag-devel] dlist patch
Brought to you by:
hegdevasant,
mananth
From: Ananth N M. <an...@in...> - 2003-07-14 12:48:39
|
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 11:50:24AM -0500, Eric Bohm wrote: > [snip] > > It does have two typedefs. If someone will explain the reasoning > behind the anti typedef prejudice to my satisfaction we can switch > those to the longer uglier struct blah model. :) > No anti typedef prejudice here but: 1. I would like to see consistency in the way we declare/handle structs and we have not used typedefs till now. 2. Ref Greg KH's OLS 2002 paper Documentation/CodingStyle and Beyond. Though this paper addresses kernel coding, I would prefer not to use them in our libs. I am not claiming that the present sysutils code is fully compliant with the CodingStyle though :) Just my 2 cents... -- Ananth Narayan Linux Technology Center, IBM Software Lab, INDIA |