Re: [limesurvey-developers] GSOC Dashboard Status
The leading Open Source survey tool
Brought to you by:
c_schmitz
From: Daniel , D. Q. M. <dqm...@gm...> - 2009-08-06 05:54:14
|
HI guys, The only reason I switched to one column and typecasting the data was the fact that when you record the answers, there will always be 4 NULL columns in every row because each row can only have 1 answer. I thought that this would result in unnecessary loss in database space. However, i did some research recently and found out that most of the RDBMS today only used 1 bit to describe NULL field. therefore, i guess the wasted space for each row would be very minimal and its worth to revert to the old model ( i.e. 5 columns for different answer types ) for the sake of speed. Luckily I just wrote the save answers to database last night so that should not be hard to change. Cheers, Daniel. On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 7:24 AM, Jason Cleeland <ja...@cl...> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > > > I think it’s best to store values in the database in their appropriate > “type”, the only reason I can think of why data isn’t stored in the database > as non-text is because we don’t have any question types yet which are > dedicated types that wouldn’t require a text field.. I haven’t looked, but > doesn’t the date question type save as a date? > > > > The reason that I used the database do some of the calculations in version > 1 is because databases are, by nature, much better at dealing with > calculations on large quantities of data. PHP isn’t so good at this. So > wherever a database can be used to do this sort of grunt work, I figure it > should be used. This matter is complicated by different db’s and their > refusal to adhere to some kind of standards. But surely each database can > handle doing things like averages, sums, counts and so on without too much > difference.. and the coding cost involved in providing different syntaxes > inside the code to handle each database would be worth the speed > enhancements? Anything more complex than this, however, and we get into > trouble. So long as we have a clear line where we stop trying to get > databases to do the calculations I can’t see anything wrong in using common > features for this. It’ll be worth the speed improvements. But that said, > sum/average/count are probably the limit to what we could expect. > > > > Type casting using the databases will be just as difficult as anything > else, since they all have different syntax for doing this. > > > > In case you’re wondering, the type casting issue is the exact reason that > there is a specific “numerical” question type in version 1, rather than just > using the short text question type for numerical questions. Because that way > we can type cast the results, which we can’t do for short text. > > > > Jason > > > > *From:* Mac Duy Hai [mailto:ma...@gm...] > *Sent:* Wednesday, 5 August 2009 8:22 PM > *To:* LimeSurvey Developer Mailing List > *Subject:* [limesurvey-developers] GSOC Dashboard Status > > > > Hello all, > > > > last week, I've been extending the Dashboard engine capabilities as a > preparation for Survey Dashboard. Addition of "Dashboard tabs" solve the > space constraint problem of displaying larger information sets in > dashboards. Widget Sharing lets the user embed a widget in an external > webpage (currently alpha quality). Other additions include drag-and-drop, > Growl-like notifications and improved search in tables. Latest screenshots > and details on the wiki page<http://www.docs.limesurvey.org/GSOC+Dashboard+Project+Development+Log> > . > > > > Me and Daniel are working closely together to connect the Dashboard and > Results systems together. Currently, all answers are stored in the database > as text, regardless of their true type. This method uses only 1 value > column, compared to the 5 for each different data type used in the original > method. On the minus side, saving everything as text prevents database > operations inherent to each data type (e.g. "10" < "5" but 10 > 5), unless > we resort to (possibly costly) type casting. Suggestions and recommendations > on this subject are more than welcome! > > > > Best wishes, > > Hai > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus > on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > limesurvey-developers mailing list > lim...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/limesurvey-developers > > |