From: Johannes S. <Joh...@gm...> - 2011-03-29 14:23:08
|
Hi, On Tue, 29 Mar 2011, Christian Beier wrote: > On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 14:48:37 +0200 (CEST) > Johannes Schindelin <Joh...@gm...> wrote: > > > On Tue, 29 Mar 2011, Christian Beier wrote: > > > > > One last thing: Are we okay with a git-style ChangeLog file as > > > printed out by 'git log' or do we want the ChangeLog to stay in GNU > > > Style > > > (http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Style-of-Change-Logs.html#Style-of-Change-Logs)? > > > > > > A rather cosmetic thing, but I thought I'd better ask :-) > > > > I do not really care, but some depending projects might prefer GNU > > style. However, there are quite a few tools to convert git log to GNU > > ChangeLog format, so I'm happy to provide pointers if need be. > > I tried git2cl (http://josefsson.org/git2cl/) which looks quite ok, > except it leaves some overly long lines in the ChangeLog and it always > includes the signed-of-by as well. It's okay with me, though, if you > don't know about better alternatives? I would have gone for one of the git2cl programs tracked on repo.or.cz, but I don't think I care that much for the ChangeLogs. git log is so much more powerful anyway. Ciao, Dscho |