From: Derek G. <fri...@gm...> - 2007-04-05 19:06:13
|
So... after a year of working on the thing... it is finally available for general use. When using it, you should absolutely expect it not to work ;-) Hopefully as we go along it will become more robust (or even completely rewritten). I actually do think that for general smoothing with maybe a small amount of redistribution it should work... but don't quote me on that ;-) At any rate, give it a whirl and see what you think! Derek PS - Is there a list we can subscribe to that sends us a message when a cvs commit occurs? It would be pretty handy since I don't do libmesh development every day... |
From: Roy S. <roy...@ic...> - 2007-04-05 19:19:12
|
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Derek Gaston wrote: > So... after a year of working on the thing... it is finally available > for general use. > > When using it, you should absolutely expect it not to work ;-) Gotcha. We should have put out a final 0.6.0 while we had the chance. Oh well. > PS - Is there a list we can subscribe to that sends us a message when > a cvs commit occurs? It would be pretty handy since I don't do > libmesh development every day... Not unless SourceForge provides such functionality. I can't say I'm clamoring for it. Most commits seem to be little corner-case bugfixes and occasional new helper methods. When something important goes in the submitter usually brags about it on libmesh-devel. ;-) --- Roy |
From: Derek G. <fri...@gm...> - 2007-04-05 19:21:38
|
On 4/5/07, Roy Stogner <roy...@ic...> wrote: > Gotcha. We should have put out a final 0.6.0 while we had the chance. > Oh well. Doh, sorry about that. I can pull it back out if you like... it's not too much... only two new files and two modfied files. Let me know. Derek |
From: Roy S. <roy...@ic...> - 2007-04-05 19:26:03
|
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Derek Gaston wrote: > On 4/5/07, Roy Stogner <roy...@ic...> wrote: >> Gotcha. We should have put out a final 0.6.0 while we had the chance. >> Oh well. > > Doh, sorry about that. I can pull it back out if you like... it's not > too much... only two new files and two modfied files. Let me know. Naah; just stick a call to untested() into the constructor or somewhere similar, like I've currently done with DiffSystem. There's no reason to deny people the chance to try out new features, as long as they know they're taking a risk with current bugs and/or future API changes. --- Roy |
From: Derek G. <fri...@gm...> - 2007-04-05 19:46:06
|
K - I also realized that I checked in a bunch of debugging cout's... I'll get those out of there as well... Derek On 4/5/07, Roy Stogner <roy...@ic...> wrote: > On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Derek Gaston wrote: > > > On 4/5/07, Roy Stogner <roy...@ic...> wrote: > >> Gotcha. We should have put out a final 0.6.0 while we had the chance. > >> Oh well. > > > > Doh, sorry about that. I can pull it back out if you like... it's not > > too much... only two new files and two modfied files. Let me know. > > Naah; just stick a call to untested() into the constructor or > somewhere similar, like I've currently done with DiffSystem. There's > no reason to deny people the chance to try out new features, as long > as they know they're taking a risk with current bugs and/or future API > changes. > --- > Roy > |