From: John P. <jwp...@gm...> - 2012-10-23 17:17:36
|
We're getting "503 Service Unavailable" errors at the moment. And at some point the certificate information changed. Anyone get that? Certificate information: - Hostname: libmesh.svn.sourceforge.net - Valid: from Sun, 23 Sep 2012 15:25:33 GMT until Thu, 22 Nov 2012 15:25:33 GMT - Issuer: 2911242016, Blue Coat SG900 Series, Some-State, - Fingerprint: 11:e6:c2:88:03:4f:21:c3:17:50:bb:94:2e:2f:39:21:d8:a5:24:bd -- John |
From: Kirk, B. (JSC-EG311) <ben...@na...> - 2012-10-23 17:22:44
|
http://sourceforge.net/blog/category/sitestatus/ On Oct 23, 2012, at 9:14 AM, John Peterson <jwp...@gm...> wrote: > We're getting "503 Service Unavailable" errors at the moment. > > And at some point the certificate information changed. Anyone get that? > > Certificate information: > - Hostname: libmesh.svn.sourceforge.net > - Valid: from Sun, 23 Sep 2012 15:25:33 GMT until Thu, 22 Nov 2012 15:25:33 GMT > - Issuer: 2911242016, Blue Coat SG900 Series, Some-State, > - Fingerprint: 11:e6:c2:88:03:4f:21:c3:17:50:bb:94:2e:2f:39:21:d8:a5:24:bd > > -- > John > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct > _______________________________________________ > Libmesh-devel mailing list > Lib...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel |
From: Derek G. <fri...@gm...> - 2012-10-23 17:24:39
|
Time to move to GitHub? They don't even know _why_ it's down yet... and apparently have no redundancy? Derek On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) < ben...@na...> wrote: > http://sourceforge.net/blog/category/sitestatus/ > > On Oct 23, 2012, at 9:14 AM, John Peterson <jwp...@gm...> wrote: > > > We're getting "503 Service Unavailable" errors at the moment. > > > > And at some point the certificate information changed. Anyone get that? > > > > Certificate information: > > - Hostname: libmesh.svn.sourceforge.net > > - Valid: from Sun, 23 Sep 2012 15:25:33 GMT until Thu, 22 Nov 2012 > 15:25:33 GMT > > - Issuer: 2911242016, Blue Coat SG900 Series, Some-State, > > - Fingerprint: > 11:e6:c2:88:03:4f:21:c3:17:50:bb:94:2e:2f:39:21:d8:a5:24:bd > > > > -- > > John > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct > > _______________________________________________ > > Libmesh-devel mailing list > > Lib...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct > _______________________________________________ > Libmesh-devel mailing list > Lib...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel > |
From: Kirk, B. (JSC-EG311) <ben...@na...> - 2012-10-23 17:27:31
|
On Oct 23, 2012, at 10:24 AM, Derek Gaston <fri...@gm...> wrote: > Time to move to GitHub? > > They don't even know _why_ it's down yet... and apparently have no redundancy? Let's find this Nemesis regression (has it been distilled? I could help…), package the next release, and then get serious about possible move… -Ben |
From: Roy S. <roy...@ic...> - 2012-10-23 17:56:26
Attachments:
parmesh_node_constraints.patch
|
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote: > Let's find this Nemesis regression (has it been distilled? I could > help…), Cory distilled it nicely a month ago; I've just been too swamped with site visit stuff to get to it. I'm cleaning up some other ParallelMesh stuff first (patch attached, in case anyone wants to double check my --enable-parmesh --enable-nodeconstraint fix) and should be able to get at it this afternoon. > package the next release, and then get serious about > possible move… This is sounding reasonable. The centralization of a non-Distributed VCS actually sounded like a nice thing to me right up until the point where it became a central point of failure. --- Roy |