From: R. <gae...@di...> - 2004-10-26 18:01:18
|
Ga=EBl Roualland a =E9crit : >=20 > Rajko Albrecht a =E9crit : > > > > On Tuesday 26 October 2004 10:09, Ga=EBl Roualland wrote: > > > > > > Then, the given date is invalid in about the given month and abou= t the > > > > given timezone. > > > > > > The timezone is actually rfc822 compliant, but the month is definit= ely > > > wrong... > > > > Ok, you're the rfc822 experts ;) Well, as I saw all other mailsoftwar= e parsed > > this date as a correct date - would it possible do the same within li= betpan? > > It isn't such needfull, I know, but it looks a little bit ... strange= when in > > list of mails there is an entry without a date... ;) >=20 > Just for personal knowledge.. do you know which mua generated such a > date ? Nevermind, I didn't remember you sent the whole mail before. Looks like "outlook" originated but probably edited by spammer program since outlook does generate valid date headers :) Ga=EBl. --=20 Ga=EBl Roualland -+- gae...@di... |