Re: [libdbi-devel] Request for automake update

[Jan E. <je...@in...>]

On Friday 2014-01-24 09:17, Markus Hoenicka wrote:

>At 2014-01-24 02:50 Jan Engelhardt was heard to say:
>> Speaking of which, autogen.sh has too much cruft. It should be removed
>> and/or replaced to only call `autoreconf -fi`. And perhaps `rm -Rf
>> autom4te.cache` because that seems to go unused.
>
>Thanks for that, I was not aware of autoreconf. It certainly make sense 
>to use that as it seems to do the right thing automagically. However, 
>I'd prefer to keep autogen.sh around, even if it contains just a single 
>call to autoreconf, for the sake of backwards compatibility.

No objections, I use an autogen.sh myself sometimes. I sent up a new 
autogen.sh into the repo.

Now, release?