Re: [Led-users] naming suggestion -- ldaped?

[Larry L. <li...@an...>]

On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Clark C. Evans wrote:

> Howdy.  This sounds like agreat project.  Perhaps the name 'ldaped' 
> would be better, 'led' is a preexisting project called "little editor",
> at http://led-editor.sf.net and thus 'led' is already taken as a 
> FreeBSD ports name.    I know ldaped is a lame name, but it is 
> very clear and it would probably make finding the project easier.

My co-workers named led for me a little over a year ago, ldaped, 
ldapvi, ldapedit, vildap, etc. were all bandied about but they
decided on led and it stuck.

If you were considering importing Led into FreeBSD ports, I would
suggest ldap-editor as the port name.  I don't recall any rules about
the FreeBSD ports tree that require the port name and installed
utility to have the same name.

Have you had a chance to try out led?  What do you think?

-- 
Larry