From: KP K. <ka...@us...> - 2011-01-22 16:31:07
|
Am Samstag, 22. Januar 2011, um 12:49:07 schrieb Andrew: > 22.01.2011 01:35, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > >> It'll be good if someone re-checks code. > >> > >> P.S. About beta2 - IMHO it'll be good to update kernel before beta2 > >> tagging to latest 2.6.35 minor (currently 2.6.35.10), and possible to > >> update busybox (or we have something that depends on bb version?) > > > > If you ask me, the kernel seems less intrusive and I vote to update. > > How much work will be to update and test busybox yet? > > > > kp > > IMHO busybox update isn't too hard. I expect that it'll be enough just > to replace old version by new one and review config, and port patches.. You've been right; the patches applied, the config changed (I had to set CONFIG_PLATFORM_LINUX=y, otherwise a few applets has been lost, anyway the binary is a little bit smaller than before) - and I was able to boot into a kernel 2.6.35.10 and busybox 1.18.2 iso image with qemu. Will commit later and rebuild everything from scratch. kp |