Re: [Lapackpp-devel] Problem with lapackpp V2.4.12 on windows
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
cstim
From: Christian S. <sti...@tu...> - 2006-08-17 07:35:47
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear Aosheng, Aosheng Rong schrieb: > Thank you very much for your free software. I am very comfortable with > your lapackpp on RHEL linux AS4. nice to hear. Thank you very much. > For some reason, I need to work on windows right now. But I have trouble > with installing your lapackpp using MS VC++. > > 1) I understand that your lapackpp need the lapack lib. But where is the > lapack on Windows. The lapack packages on windows available from > internet seem not work on Windows. From your instruction, we need to run > setup.exe version before we install .vcproj file in source > package(tar.gz). But I can not find your setup.exe package in your > latest version 2.4.12. However, I noticed that you have both .exe > and tar.gz in version 2.4.11. The underlying lapack32.lib plus lapack32.dll plud blas32.lib plus blas32.dll *could* be compiled by everyone, "simply" by retrieving the original LAPACK.tgz source package plus applying the contrib/lapack.diff patch included in our lapackpp source package. *However* I understand not everyone is familiar in doing so. Also, these libraries haven't changed at all during the last 2-3 years. So I ship these four files in compiled form in the lapackpp-setup.exe packages, but they are really identical from version to version. So to answer your question: The lapack32.lib etc. files in the older setup.exe packages are still up to date. Please simply use them from the older setup.exe packages -- but make sure you *don't* use the lapackpp header files from the older setup.exe packages. > As you may know, many people are confused with and have trouble with > installing lapack on windows. I am not sure if your setup.exe package > provides liblapack.lib and libblas32.lib,which are identical with > counterpart in fortran version? Yes they are. > 2) I notice that your package did not include headers for the complex > inverse matrix . Can you include the complex inverse matrix in > your future release? What do you mean by "complex inverse matrix"? There are matrices of complex numbers in include/gmc.h, although they will only be compiled when LA_COMPLEX_SUPPORT is defined, which by default is not the case for MSVC. Is this what you are looking for? Christian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQCVAwUBROQcN2XAi+BfhivFAQJnyQP/Q4fAP7g/S8GoqSAS26dDmvrcTaKdY1Yq NwH4q9udMhF2wAIqldDtNw2wgr4R7oFzcOuEPZKWRWdA47wWz4NrYW00fCv5dy2n IBD6GZ2vdHdzlTuf2s1yuzQ6OkXpO0yw5pC4qgLAxswt2OoGVIYyQa/MaeA+b3S/ dZVfVrApWS4= =w46G -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |