[Langband-devel] Re: Perhaps an easier way?

[Tom B. <to...@wo...>]

Stig Erik Sandoe <st...@ii...> writes:

> 
> (Did I answer your question or did I miss it?)

Yes, you answered my question.  It's just that the prospect of a Lisp
Angband seems so interesting.  Many other projects including mine get
so ambitious that they never actually get finished.  I don't want to
see it happen here.

And FWIW, I don't know if the list has considered this, but if
*_info.txt were represented as sexps, it wouldn't take much code to
edit most of them with emacs' edb, which would be much easier than
now.

-- 
Tom Breton, http://world.std.com/~tob
Not using "gh" since 1997. http://world.std.com/~tob/ugh-free.html