Re: Re[2]: [Lame-dev] bug

[Michael F. <Mic...@as...>]

Hi,

> Hello Gabriel,
> 
> Wednesday, February 13, 2002, 4:11:41 PM, you wrote:
> 
> GB> The problem is that older Cyrix processors have a cpuid instruction,
> but do
> GB> not respond properly to it by default, so it could fool Lame's
> processor
> GB> features detection.
> 
> GB> In order to be sure, it could be usefull if the user could tests a
> Lame
> GB> binary that doesn't include any assembly optimization.
> 
> as i remember i sent him binary compiled without nasm, it works fine
> on Cyrix. but this was during lame3.88

Maybe it has to do with the disabled CPUID command on cyrix's. I found 
something at Google Groups:
http://groups.google.de/groups?q=cyrix+enable+cpuid&hl=de&selm=6evfj5%24nqj%241%
40winter.news.erols.com&rnum=3

Maybe the code for enabling the CPUID command can be used in LAME.

HTH
Michael
-- 
mic...@as... - http://www.vividos.de - icq: 6323332
winLAME: http://winlame.sourceforge.net