[Lame-cvs] test cases updated

[Mark T. <mt...@mp...>]

> 
> AL> That's alot of diff.
> Roel said "all CBR(>>=64kbit/s)/ABR/VBR LAME files" have the new
> AL> "LAME Tag" and the huge diff above may be because of this, but if so,
> AL> why doesn't ABR produces such a huge diff too?
> 
> VBR and ABR already had a Xing-clone-tag in front of them. The LAME
> Tag is exactly the same, only with a few extra bytes.
> 
> CBR on the other hand, never HAD an extra tag, so this translates all
> data in position a frame => big dif.  While on the VBR and ABR
> comparison only those few bits changed.
> 
> You are correct about this "adding CRC should not come up with
> --quiet".
> 
> However, just add "-t" for the diff tests and no tag of any kind
> interferes with the music data.
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
>  Roel                            mailto:vd...@yu...
> 

I ran the test script on the .wav outptu (encode+decode), and the results
are identical, so it is as Roel said - just changes in the tags.
I'll update the test cases.

Mark