From: Avi K. <av...@qu...> - 2007-02-28 16:42:48
|
Andrew Olney wrote: > I'd almost swear that KVM is faster with an XP raw image that was > installed by Xen, than it is with a raw image installed by KVM. > > That may well be. Perhaps the images have different HALs. Compare the values under My Computer | Properties | Hardware | Device Manager | Computer. Maybe one uses the "Standard PC" HAL (faster) and the other the ACPI HAL (slower). You can also change HALs (required reboot). > On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 09:10 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > >> Andrew Olney wrote: >> >>> I've been migrating from Xen to KVM for a wide variety of reasons. >>> >>> I've noticed, however, that XP installs much much faster with Xen (3.03 >>> xen-image-xen0-2.6.17-6-generic-xen0 ubuntu) than with KVM (14). >>> >>> >> btw, as both Xen and kvm use qemu, Xen full virtualization images should >> work without change in kvm. >> >> >> >> > > -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function |