From: Bodo S. <bo...@le...> - 2008-03-18 17:27:32
|
Michael Peters <mp...@pl...> wrote: > > So this proposition is more along the lines of what Michael proposed in > > his first alternative. Does this revised version make sense to you? > > I like it. I was a little bit weary of just restoring the session as there could > be some unintended consequences when just restoring arbitrary objects that the > session might hold. Yes, that's why a spoke of a well-defined subset of the session :) What would you think should be part of this subset, besides the sorting orders? Bodo |