Re: [Kgdb-bugreport] kgdboe and console messages : recursion in put_packet() path
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
jwessel
From: Stelian P. <st...@po...> - 2004-04-09 08:05:28
|
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 04:23:37PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > > > It's safe to printk in KGDB, iff you don't have KGDB_CONSOLE is true. > > > Conversly, it's not safe iff you have KGDB_CONSOLE, so my original > > > proposal to have kgdb_console_write make sure we aren't in > > > kgdb_handle_exception should be OK. :) > > > > Sure, it's getting late so I won't argue anymore :) > > OK. This is all in CVS now. And it looks like I lost some of my > docbook comments along the way elsewhere, so I'm going to try and fix > those up tomorrow. Great. However, I noticed you didn't integrate neither your latest cleanup patch(*) which is necessary in order to make KGDB work with my pcmcia card, nor my netpoll_set_trap() related patch(§) which is needed for (at least) ARP to work. Is there a reason ? Stelian. (PS: I will be unavailable for the next 3 days so I may not be able to participate in the discussions...) *: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=7715552 §: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=7730510 -- Stelian Pop <st...@po...> |