From: jb <jb...@kd...> - 2012-05-29 22:16:49
|
Hi everyone. I just released Kdenlive 0.9.2 that fixes most of the regressions found in Kdenlive 0.9 as well as some other bugs. The source tarball is currently being moved to the KDE servers and will be available here: http://download.kde.org/stable/kdenlive/ I will be preparing the announcement soon. By the way, I have some questions about our releases versioning. Will Stephenson asked me to keep the same number of digits in our releases or it can create problems in packaging management. So my guess is that we should use the rather standard x.y.z format where x is increased when a new major release is made, y is increased when a new minor release is made and z is for bugfix releases. Is that ok for everyone? Second question, in Randa last year we decided to use even number for stable releases and odd numbers for development releases. However that was before the move to git, and now I am not sure it really makes sense. For example I created a 0.9 branch and will make bugfix releases for that branch. In my opinion, the bugfix releases should be called 0.9.1, 0.9.2, etc. Since these are bugfix releases there is no unstable releases between them... The biggest puzzle for me is what version number should be used for trunk now that there is a 0.9 branch... Your thoughts are welcome, Jean-Baptiste |
From: Michael S. <mi...@os...> - 2012-05-30 06:03:10
|
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:16:40AM +0200, jb wrote: > So my guess is that we should use the rather standard x.y.z > format where x is increased when a new major release is made, > y is increased when a new minor release is made and z is for > bugfix releases. Is that ok for everyone? Fine with me. > Second question, in Randa last year we decided to use even > number for stable releases and odd numbers for development > releases. However that was before the move to git, and now > I am not sure it really makes sense. Maybe but only if there are actual users of unstable *releases* since these tend to rely on upstream SCM anyways. Are there any? > The biggest puzzle for me is what version number should be used > for trunk now that there is a 0.9 branch... Depends on what comes out of that "trunk": if the next version getting tagged is 0.9.x, then 0.9; if it would be 0.10.0, then 0.10; if the goal is 1.0.0, then 1.0. See http://collectd.org for one of quite elaborate examples: http://git.verplant.org/?p=collectd.git (one of my favourite upstreams in both functional and packaging senses :) -- ---- WBR, Michael Shigorin <mi...@al...> ------ Linux.Kiev http://www.linux.kiev.ua/ |
From: Patrick M. <pma...@de...> - 2012-05-30 16:47:23
Attachments:
signature.asc
|
Am 30.05.2012 00:16, schrieb jb: > Hi everyone. > > I just released Kdenlive 0.9.2 that fixes most of the regressions found in > Kdenlive 0.9 as well as some other bugs. > > The source tarball is currently being moved to the KDE servers and will be > available here: > > http://download.kde.org/stable/kdenlive/ > > I will be preparing the announcement soon. > When will it be available? ;) -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pma...@de... pa...@li... */ |
From: Javier A. F. A. <el...@gm...> - 2012-05-30 16:51:09
|
same question here :-) On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Patrick Matthäi <pma...@de...>wrote: > Am 30.05.2012 00:16, schrieb jb: > > Hi everyone. > > > > I just released Kdenlive 0.9.2 that fixes most of the regressions found > in > > Kdenlive 0.9 as well as some other bugs. > > > > The source tarball is currently being moved to the KDE servers and will > be > > available here: > > > > http://download.kde.org/stable/kdenlive/ > > > > I will be preparing the announcement soon. > > > > When will it be available? ;) > > > -- > /* > Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, > Patrick Matthäi > GNU/Linux Debian Developer > > E-Mail: pma...@de... > pa...@li... > */ > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Kdenlive-devel mailing list > Kde...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kdenlive-devel > > |
From: jb <jb...@kd...> - 2012-05-30 22:27:45
|
On Wednesday 30 May 2012 18:47:07 Patrick Matthäi wrote: > Am 30.05.2012 00:16, schrieb jb: > > Hi everyone. > > > > I just released Kdenlive 0.9.2 that fixes most of the regressions found in > > Kdenlive 0.9 as well as some other bugs. > > > > The source tarball is currently being moved to the KDE servers and will be > > available here: > > > > http://download.kde.org/stable/kdenlive/ > > > > I will be preparing the announcement soon. > > When will it be available? ;) Now... releases on the KDE servers have to be approved, so it took a few hours before being available.. regards jb |
From: Ed R. <ed....@go...> - 2012-06-05 12:00:17
|
I absolutely agree with Michael. regards eddrog |