From: Mike T. <mi...@mi...> - 2005-05-03 15:05:00
|
> Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 16:54:24 +0200 > From: "Fausto Lelli" <f....@in...> > > I was thinking about XML > (<and><term>cat</term><term>dog</term></and>), > because DOM structure shouldn't make assumption about the children > nodes order. Really? Are you saying that the DOM trees for <html><p>first para</p><p>second para</p></html> and <html><p>second para</p><p>first para</p></html> should be considered identical? _/|_ ___________________________________________________________________ /o ) \/ Mike Taylor <mi...@mi...> http://www.miketaylor.org.uk )_v__/\ "Thou shalt check the array bounds of all strings for surely where thou typest `foo' someone someday shall type `supercalifragilisticexpialidocious'" -- Henry Spencer's 5th Commandment for C Programmers. -- Listen to free demos of soundtrack music for film, TV and radio http://www.pipedreaming.org.uk/soundtrack/ |