From: Stuart D. G. <st...@bm...> - 2006-03-31 05:04:41
|
> Does my valuable code suddenly become a thing > that can't jump into the future? Granted there will > probably be work between jython version to jython > version to have it work. I had to do some recoding to > get it to work from jython 2.1 to jython 2.2. Keep in mind that the whole point of JyJy, like Jython is to integrate with Java. So, classes written in JyJy, even though the source code syntax might look like Python, are still Java classes. Just like classes written in Jython today look like python but are real Java classes as far as the JVM is concerned. Presumably, the (as yet far off) JyJy project will preserve those portions of the externally visible API deemed important. -- Stuart D. Gathman <st...@bm...> Business Management Systems Inc. Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154 "Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis" - background song for a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial. |