Antw: Re: [Jython-dev] Is Jython viable anymore ? (about bugs notfixed, status of Jython development etc.)

[Olivier L. <Oli...@bi...>]

Samuele Pedroni wrote:

> jythonc is too onerous to maintain, it's a full 2nd compiler

Speaking as a user, it did strike me that jythonc an jython are effectively=
 separate
projects, with different audiences. If hiving off jythonc from jython (at =
the risk of
seeing it die) can make the burden of maintaining jython more manageable =
and=20
ensure its viability, that should probably be considered.

> OTOH if someone is interested in doing pure bug-fixes releases of =
[jython 2.1]
> we can discuss that.

But wouldn't that require some sort of developer's guide to the jython =
sources?
In their present form, they are rather forbidding. You asked about that a =
while
back. Are you considering writing such a document?

Regards,

-- O.L.