Re: [Jsbsim-devel] New Geek on-board

[Erik H. <er...@eh...>]

Jon Berndt wrote:
>>No it isn't. Patches have been rejected in the past and will be rejected 
>>in the future. The reason for this is that disabled code (like WeatherCM 
>>in the past) will get out of sync slowly (and maybe unnoticeable) and 
>>run out of sync quicker and quicker until it reaches a point where it 
>>will be impossible to get it working again.
> 
> OK, it's not a big deal, but how could this be the case for an FDM?

It's just very hard to get everything working properly for every 
exception. If I (or someone else) makes a change that effects the FDM, 
but I haven't included all FDM's by default we are already in trouble.

Erik