From: Miguel <mi...@jm...> - 2004-12-15 16:44:38
|
Bob, It looks like your updates did not get deployed to the public web site ..= . I was unable to find the changes you listed below. > OK, I have updated some of the script documentation: > > http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr/jmol/docs/index.htm=23.color > > --includes =22monomer=22 > > http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr/jmol/docs/index.htm=23.show > > --includes > > > show file > > show center > > show boundbox > > show zoom > > show transform > > http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr/jmol/docs/index.htm=23.set%20(colo= r%20scheme) > > --corrected description > > =5Bcomment: =22set colorscheme=22 would make more sense here, I think.=5D= Not sure exactly what you are saying. In the future we may extend 'set color' to allow one to change other type= s of colors. > http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr/jmol/docs/index.htm=23.zoom > > --better description > > In addition, a number of potential functionalities are listed as =22not= > implemented.=22 > > Right now I list: > > bond --not implemented > clipboard --not implemented > connect --not implemented > display3d --not implemented > help --not implemented > list --not implemented > molecule --not implemented > pause --not implemented > wait --not implemented > print --not implemented > renumber --not implemented > save --not implemented > set backfade --not implemented > set cartoon --not implemented > set hourglass --not implemented > set kinemage --not implemented > set menus --not implemented > set mouse --not implemented > set radius --not implemented > set shadow --not implemented > set slabmode --not implemented > set transparent --not implemented > set vectps --not implemented > set write --not implemented > star --not implemented > stereo --not implemented > structure --not implemented > unbound --not implemented > view --not implemented > write --not implemented > > Presumably these are of interest for two reasons: (a) people familiar w= ith > Rasmol/Chime might be looking for these, and (b) having them there migh= t > give developers something to think about. > > But they are also a bit distracting. I suspect I got these from scannin= g > eval.js. Is it time to remove some/all of them? I think it is a good idea to leave them in ... for the reasons you cited above. Miguel |