From: Bradley S. <br...@ba...> - 2002-10-11 15:32:14
|
Why not just convert every string to a key value and put all strings in the Jmol_en.properties file? Then everything would use getString. No autogeneration would be necessary. Everything to be translated would be in one file. Wouldn't this simplify the process? Bradley ----- Original Message ----- From: "E.L. Willighagen" <eg...@sc...> To: "mth" <mt...@mt...>; <br...@ba...> Cc: <jmo...@li...> Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 1:46 AM Subject: Re: [Jmol-developers] L10n and Jmol*.properties files > What we easily could do is this: > > - separate English strings retrieved with translate() and those with > getString() into two files: Jmol_en.properties and Jmol.properties. > - Jmol_en.properties would be autogenerated from the source code by searching > for strings used as parameters in translate() calls > - Other localizations, Jmol_xx.properties, would also be generated as such, > but we would also include lines from Jmol.properties that need to be > translated > - The scripts/programs used in step 2 and 3 must be aware of previous > localizations and takes values from those resource to be used in the new > localization file > > How does that sound? > > Egon > |