From: <pin...@li...> - 2013-10-30 14:34:04
|
Angel, i put on my blog the version that Bob has to combine JME and JSmol without much transfer. It seems working better Pino >----Messaggio originale---- >Da: ang...@ua... >Data: 29/10/2013 18.08 >A: <jmo...@li...> >Ogg: Re: [Jmol-users] R: Re: Parsing JME string > >Thanks for the feedback, Pino > >Then maybe the 3D minimization is much slower in the Javascript >version that in the Java version. > >I've now added an option to the JSME page to check if it is the >transfer (unlikely), adding the hydrogens or the 3D minimization >which gives the delay >That is only useful for MOL transfer. >JME transfer must necessarily go to 3D conversion, that may be the >bottleneck. > >It seems indeed that it is the JmeReader routine that takes its time > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >Android is increasing in popularity, but the open development platform that >developers love is also attractive to malware creators. Download this white >paper to learn more about secure code signing practices that can help keep >Android apps secure. >http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=65839951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >_______________________________________________ >Jmol-users mailing list >Jmo...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users > |