From: Robert H. <ha...@st...> - 2012-04-08 18:07:30
|
OK. Go for it! I don't recommend starting with the super compressed JavaScript business, though. Keep it readable. But the idea, I think, is that we would have something like var jmol = new Jmol() and go from there, right? That would be great. Bob On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Paul Pillot < pau...@ac...> wrote: > I'm willing to try ! > -Paul > Le 8 avr. 2012 à 17:29, Robert Hanson a écrit : > > > definitely should be done. Then one could be much more specific about > which applet you are working with, and everything would go a lot more > smoothly. Volunteers! > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. > Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You. > Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2 > _______________________________________________ > Jmol-users mailing list > Jmo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users > -- Robert M. Hanson Professor of Chemistry St. Olaf College 1520 St. Olaf Ave. Northfield, MN 55057 http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr phone: 507-786-3107 If nature does not answer first what we want, it is better to take what answer we get. -- Josiah Willard Gibbs, Lecture XXX, Monday, February 5, 1900 |