From: Rzepa, H. S <h....@im...> - 2012-03-01 15:51:58
|
On 1 Mar 2012, at 15:09, Jaime Prilusky wrote: > On Mar 1, 2012, at 4:50 PM, Nicolas Vervelle wrote: > If you have ideas of what syntax should be used in the extension to make using it simple, don't hesitate. > > > If you keep the isosurface file together with the model file, then a simple <isosurface> tag to indicate the name of the isosurface file (not the full path) can be used to setup the internal default file path to the location of the model file, and call the load. > early versions of .jvxl used to include the coordinates as well as the surface, but (I might have mis-understood) the design nowadays is to keep these as separate files. If of course, it is still possible to write out a .jvxl file with both features, that would solve the immediate problem (but not the general one). |