From: Frieda R. <fr...@ns...> - 2006-10-08 15:10:35
|
OK, I was completely wrong on this one and I withdraw the question. The surface difference was in fact due to a version difference, which I completely missed and thought I had accounted for. The versions do come at us fast, but still one should be able to keep them straight. Sorry to have posted the list with this. Frieda On Oct 7, 2006, at 4:31 PM, Frieda Reichsman wrote: > The surfaces really do come out looking different, even using > exactly the same file (1mbo.cif). to see this, compare the surface > generated at the test page, > http://www.stolaf.edu/academics/chemapps/jmol/docs/examples-11/new.htm > under the category "isosurface select(xxx) ignore(not xxx) sasurface" > > with the one generated by clicking the first button at > http://moleculesinmotion.com/JACdev10970 > > Now granted I am using 10.9.70 and the test page is using 10.9.72, /////////////////////////////////////////// Frieda Reichsman, PhD Molecules in Motion Interactive Molecular Structures http://www.moleculesinmotion.com /////////////////////////////////////////// |