From: Nicolas V. <nve...@cl...> - 2006-05-03 04:17:07
|
Miguel wrote: >> Miguel wrote: >> >>> I will see how difficult it will be for me to revert back to shorts in >>> order to understand what is going on ... not that going back to shorts is >>> an option. >>> > > This is more on Nico's problem than Bob's problem ... > > I just did a very unscientific test ... > > On my linux box > using current trunk r5050 > using the Jmol application > using caffeine.xyz > using a window size of about 400x400 > using 'spin on' > using 'top' to measure CPU consumption > > CPU percentage seemed to be about 37% > > I rolled the zbuffer back from 'int' to 'short' > > The CPU percentage seemed to be about 35% > > I am satisfied that the switch short->int did not introduce a noticable > performance problem ... certainly nothing that would account for a 3 fold > CPU consumption increase. > > I am going to check in the code and then immediately revert it ... so that > we will have the 'diff' to reapply it again in the future if we need to. > > Nico, if you want to try this on Windows you can ... the Windows video > system is generally faster ... I suppose it is possible that there could > be some difference, but I don't think so. > Ok, I will try to get some time this evening to make a few tests with the application. > Nico, we should see if we can reproduce this problem in the Jmol > application ... comparing 10.00.xx with 10.2.0 and the current trunk. > Yes, I will try with extracting a few SVN revisions. I have to go to work now, will try this evening. Nico |